DEMETRE G LUPU FIRST PRESIDENT OF THE HCCJ ROMANIA. 1940.

6 SEPTEMBER 1940

The national Legionary State, having been established by the treatourous actions of Ion Antonescu, in conivience with the Iron Guard, had decapitated the Romanian State of the legitimacy, needed for a Nation to function as a democratic entity.

Romania, lost three of the fundamental pillars, necessary to function as a legitimate  state: The Legislative, Constitutional, and Executive , branch, being eliminated by the treatourous act of  : 6 September,1940.

Ion Antonescu, besides, claiming, a fake executive mandate, assigned by himself, relied  on the only remanant institution of the Legislative; the HCCJ. From there on, until the demise of the Ion Antonescu, regime, the HCCJ, would be the only organ, of the state, with powers vested unto it.

In this fashion, both Ion Antonescu, and Mihai Antonescu, captured the HCCJ, and took into the fold of the “National Legionary State,” and beyond, until the surrender that took place on 23 August 1944.

In order to capture the HCCJ, it was necessary, to have the head of the institution,: M. Demeter George Lupu; first president of the HCCJ, and the five ruling presidents, of the court. To achieve this, moneys, and honorary distinctions, were assigned to the first president, and the court.

In 1940, took place, the revision of the trial on : Cornelius Z. Codreanu, the purpose of the trial ; the reinstalment of Codreanu, and the Iron Guard, was achieved by the means of this “Mock trial” . At the time, M. D.G. Lupu, was acting

As lawyer in the case:

“…Dimitrie Lupu, after having made the appeal of the civil party, read out the Decision No. l of the Special Review Commission, by which the Captain's case was sent to the High Court of Cassation. The reading of this decision lasted 30 minutes and was listened to in deep silence by the entire audience. After the reading, President Dimitrie Lupu gave the floor to Prosecutor-General Coman Negoescu.

The Public Prosecutor's Office demands the Captain's rehabilitation and the annulment of the sentence

Prosecutor-General Coman Negoescu accepted the conclusions of the Review Commission and addressing the Court said the following:

"You, called upon to pronounce on the merits of the review, taking into account the Commission's research and conclusions, admitting in principle the review, are going to declare the conviction decision invalid and to rehabilitate the memory of the convicted Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, of course making an examination of the decision and seeing if the conviction decision is not maintained on other grounds.

In this case, if one examines the conviction decision, it is clear that it cannot find another basis. Corneliu Zelea Codreanu was convicted of four acts, crimes and misdemeanours. The Commission of admission in principle found that the law was wrongly applied and that the facts were wrongly established. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are imposed before you.

On the basis of these findings and conclusions, since the conviction decision cannot be upheld on other grounds, you should, applying Article 508 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, declare the conviction decision null and void and rehabilitate the memory of Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, thus putting an end to the effects of a decision tainted by error.

These are our conclusions".

A year later, Mister; D.G Lupu, was compensaded by an official appointment, as First President of the HCCJ.

Both Ion Antonescu, and Mihai Antonescu, having captured the HCCJ, into its fold, through the docile complicity of Mister; D.G Lupu, began a campaign of confiscation ,nationalizations, plunder, of properties belonging to those deemed “Enemy of the regime”

Beginning with, the expoliation of the properties, belonging to King Carol II of Romania; as started in the the infamous : DECIZIA. Nr 1. November 1941. Followed by the infamous laws, of “Romanization” aimed at the seizure, and plunder of properties belonging to the Jewish population, in Romania.

The descent to the abyss, started on 6 September 1940, by an ambitious and cunning , Ion Antonescu, ended abruptly on 23 August 1944.

However,to this day, the memory of Antonescu, is maintained, by a wide spectrum of polititians, who wish to preserve his memory, for the purpose, of legitimizing the “Coup d’etat” Ion Antonescu, lead against the legitimate head of the Romanian state; King Carol II, of Romania.

Substantial state funds, have found in government, polititians, newspapers, journals, TV stations, forums, an eager clientele for the rehabilitation of Antonescu’s figure in the public opinion of the country. This manipulation of History, is not only a fraud to Romanians, but it is the desire, of a political class, that wishes to retain a position of power, that is based on an eligitimate and pernicious event that took place on 6, September, 1940.

Mr. Demeter G Lupu, , after the demise of Ion Antonescu, was removed from his functions as first president of the HCCJ, however, thanks to the protection of the provisional head of state of the government established by the Allied Comission, was granted temporary protection, from charges against him, concerning his close ties to the Iron Guard.

THE PURGE OF Mr. D.G. LUPU./ Eugene PETIT / Constantin MACRI/ M. MOSGOS/

Decree: Nr. 2425 of 14 November 1944.

“….DIMITRIE G LUPU, to President Macri and to Councillor Petit, saying Minister Pàtràscanu was surprised that they had not submitted their resignations after his speech to the members of the Court of Cassation. First President Lupu, following this attitude of the Communist Minister of Justice, asked for an audience with the King. This hearing was granted today, and , DIMITRIE G LUPU was informed that he would be detained "The last amendment to the Law for the purge of the state apparatus provided that, in order to assess the removal from the judiciary of some members of the High Court of Cassation, the commission should be composed of two members of the Court of Cassation and the Minister of Justice (Pàtràscanu) himself as president. For the other courts, the same commission, but with the possibility of delegating a third counsellor from the Court of Cassation instead of the Minister.Following this provision, the Minister appointed to the commission (as published in today's newspapers) the counsellors from the Court of Cassation, D. Ariton and Al. Ulvineanu, and for Monday (tomorrow) 27 November has ordered to be summoned before it the following members of the Cassation: , DIMITRIE G LUPU, first president, C. Macri and Coman Negoescu, presidents, E. In a statement also published today by the minister, he said that although the former minister, Càpàtînà, had appointed a purge commission which included the first president , DIMITRIE G LUPU, president Mogos and the attorney general Eugen Bànescu, this commission had not worked, and therefore had not carried out any purge. And the minister added in his statement: "I consider any comment superfluous! "This statement causes surprise to all because, as soon as the decree-law of purge drafted by the counsellor Càpàtînà when he was minister, signed by the King, appeared, the present Minister of Justice himself attacked it saying that some of its provisions were introduced by forgery, asking for another decree-law to be made. When, therefore, everyone was expecting an amendment to the decree-law, when the president of the numity commission himself was attacked... ending with dismissal, will result in loss of pension rights. The draft decree also contains the provision that the officials summoned have the right to challenge the members of the commission, according to the rules of criminal procedure";Today, at the Court of Cassation, the solemn opening of the judicial year was very simple and brief. Almost 20 of the magistrates who have done honour to the High Court were missing, some of them having been dismissed, others retired for age limits, under the new law. Of the former presidents, only Coman Negoescu, who presided over the solemnity, remained";In yesterday's newspapers, the text of the decree-law for the prosecution and punishment of those guilty of the country's disaster and that of the decree-law for the prosecution and punishment .”of criminals and war profiteers was published. After the first decree, the following are guilty of the disaster of the country: a) those who established the dictatorship regime and, having effective political responsibility, endangered.